Xoge,一个标榜社区驱动的多链Meme项目,试图在拥挤的加密货币市场中开辟一片新天地。它不仅仅满足于单一区块链,而是选择在多个链上发行代币,构建一个看似去中心化的生态系统。这种策略,究竟是战略性的扩张,还是单纯的为了博眼球?项目方声称要促进社区互动和价值交换,但最终能否摆脱Meme币的短期炒作命运,实现长期价值,仍然是一个巨大的问号。总而言之,Xoge试图用社区自治和趣味性来包装自己,但其核心仍然是一场关于信仰和FOMO(Fear of Missing Out)的豪赌。
查看项目官方Twitter发布的推文
Coded, domain setting and account delete into the mad lab tonight. Also got booted off ripple s1 and s2 either they went down or I got banned, dunno LOL. Uhhh, made a wss node - started using that. *I know right* No you can't stop me. I will not be stopped. Not possible. Do not try. $Xoge is the #XRPL.
今晚在疯狂实验室里编写代码、设置域名和删除账户。还被踢出了Ripple的s1和s2,不知道是它们宕机了还是我被封了,哈哈。呃,创建了一个wss节点——开始使用它。*我知道对吧* 不,你阻止不了我。我不会被阻止。不可能。别试了。$Xoge就是#XRPL。
Yeah but... don't a lot of xrpl node operators get annoyed about "the best incentive is no incentive"? Well Xoge found an incentive to launch a product on the xrpl and is being mis labeled because of it. In my mind xaman has two options... #1 Change the "probable fraud" tag they have placed on his transactions to something more accurate like "memo use by this sender is unexonomical and my cause increased fees for usage" #2 create a white-list of approved projects that develop thier own tool and let it be. The community is not happy about the fraud label placed on a trusted project at all and rightfully so.. There is nuance to everything and allowing the fraud label to exist simply because the platform doesn't like memos isn't a reason to label a project as fraud. The current label is the issue here.
是的,但是...很多xrpl节点操作者不是对“最好的激励是没有激励”感到恼火吗? 嗯,Xoge找到了在xrpl上推出产品的激励,并因此被错误地标记了。 在我看来,xaman有两个选择... #1 将他们放在他交易上的“可能欺诈”标签更改为更准确的标签,比如“此发送者的备忘录使用不经济,可能会导致使用费用增加” #2 创建一个批准项目的白名单,这些项目开发自己的工具,并让它存在。 社区对在一个可信项目上贴上欺诈标签非常不满,这是理所当然的... 每件事都有细微差别,仅仅因为平台不喜欢备忘录就允许欺诈标签存在,这不是将项目标记为欺诈的理由。 当前的标签是这里的问题。